Howard Sober, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by TAMM, Circuit Judge.
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
This case arose because the Interstate Commerce Commission committed a clerical error. Howard Sober, Inc. (Sober), the petitioner here, seeks review of the Commission’s order that corrected the error by restricting its certificate of public convenience and necessity to exclude secondary movements in driveaway service.1 We agree with the Commission that it has the authority to rectify ministerial mistakes made in good faith and, therefore, we affirm.
I
The facts in this case are intricate and require considerable elaboration…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gagnon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bell v. HearneSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Watson Bros. Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1955
- Eagle Motor Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Ass'n of Recycling Industries, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Howard Sober, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980