Legal Opinion

Willamette Falls Canal & Lock Co. v. Gordon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Clackamas County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Prim, C. J.:

The respondent is a private corporation and brought this action to recover the possession of certain real property alleged to be in the possession of John Gordon, and withheld by him from respondent. Gordon filed an answer admitting that he was in the possession of the land in controversy, but denying the ownership of respondent.

He further alleged in his answer that J ames M. Moore, Maria M. Moore, and Robert M. Moore, were the owners in fee of said land, and that he was in the possession thereof as their tenant. Upon the filing of this answer, the above parties were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Dublin v. ChadbournMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
  2. Castro v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Fotheree v. LawrenceMississippi Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Keith v. CheenyOregon Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. House v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. In re John's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bogard v. BarhanOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Smith v. McDuffeeOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Davis v. ChamberlainOregon Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API