Legal Opinion
Whittlesey v. Circuit Court for Baltimore County
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1990No. 88-7697PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:
In this case we must decide whether a federal habeas corpus petitioner has fulfilled the statutory requirement of exhaustion of state court remedies, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b), despite having deprived the state court system of the opportunity to pass upon his habeas claims by escaping from prison, fleeing to another state, committing crimes in that other state, and being imprisoned there for those crimes. The district court held that petitioner failed to exhaust his state court remedies since his own conduct had denied the state courts “a full and fair opportunity to first…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lawrence Lines v. David Larkins, Warden the District Attorney of the County of Bucks the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Thomas W. Mallory, Jr. v. David K. Smith, Warden James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Dee Farmer v. Circuit Court of Maryland for Baltimore County Attorney General of the State of Maryland Richard H. RisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Whittlesey v. Circuit Court For Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Lawrence Lines v. David Larkins, Warden the District Attorney of the County of Bucks the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.