Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Goodspeed v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 2005No. PD-1882-03Published

1Concurrence

PRICE, J.,

concurring in which COCHRAN, J., joined.

I agree with the majority that the record in this case is inadequate for us to resolve the appellant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. I write separately to explain the difference between this case and Andrews v. State.1

In Andrews, defense counsel failed to correct a misstatement of the law that was harmful to his client.2 There was no possible reasonable trial strategy that would lead defense counsel to choose to remain silent. Thus, counsel’s reasons, if any, were unnecessary to resolve the ineffective assistance of counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API