Bissett v. Grantham

The defendants were, on final hearing of this case, perpetually enjoined from selling certain real property of the plaintiff under a deed of trust executed by its former owner. Prom this decree the defendant bank appeals, and assigns for error that, under the weight of the evidence, the decree is erroneous. Touching the substantial facts on which the decree rests there is no controversy, and hence we give a brief summary of the facts found by the decree, which are as follows:

On the fifteenth of February, 1892, one Kelley executed his negotiable note for $2,965.86 to one Horine, bearing date…