Legal Opinion

Rapoport v. Sirott

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1965No. Appeal, 375PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This is an appeal from a default judgment entered in a trespass action by the Court of Common Pleas No. 6 of Philadelphia County as a sanction under Pa. R. C. P. 4019.

On January 9, 1964, Irvin Rapoport (Rapoport), by the issuances of a summons, instituted a trespass action for criminal conversation against George Sirott (Sirott). Service of this summons was made upon the desk clerk in charge of the Parkway House, Philadelphia, which; Rapoport contends, was the residence of Sirott at that time. According to an affidavit of record — unnoted on the docket entries —…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Kine v. FormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pompa v. HojnackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. In Re Estate of KleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Lapp v. TitusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Verbalis v. VerbalisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Woods v. PeckichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API