Legal Opinion

People v. Rauf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s argument that the trial court abused its discretion in sua sponte rescinding its oral decision granting defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject defendant’s contention on the merits. A nisi prius court “has the inherent power, sua sponte or on motion of a party, to reconsider and vacate its prior decision before issuing an order thereon” (Hulett v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 1 AD3d 999, 1003 [2003]; see also American Re-Ins. Co. v SGB Universal Bldrs. Supply, 160 AD2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ElmendorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. RaufAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. RaufAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API