Legal Opinion

Prater v. Riechman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Shelby County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court. — J. P. Young, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buchanan

Dr. Prater was a' practicing physician residing in Memphis, a married man, and the head of a family. He *486owned a two-seated runabout automobile, valued at not less than $100, which he used in calling upon his patients in and out of the city. He also frequently hauled groceries and other small articles in the automobile. He owned no horse or buggy, or other vehicle.

The sheriff, having in hand an execution at law against him, levied the same on the automobile, and Prater brought an action of replevin, claiming the property to be exempt under Shannon’s Code, section 3794. The circuit court, and…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lebovitz v. Hagemeyer (In Re Lebovitz)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Pellish Bros. v. CooperWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  3. In Re SumerellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996
  4. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. HardenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. Whitney v. WelnitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API