Legal Opinion
Neal v. Foster
United States Circuit Court
Decided April 5, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity. On demurrer to cross-bill. Action to sot aside conveyances.
1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.
The original bill in this case was filed on July 1, 1886, against James H. Foster, John A. Crawford, William Crawford, Ashby Pearce, John R. Baltimore, J. L. Tiles, E. Walden, and W. H. Goltra, and the object of it was to have certain conveyances of real property situate in Albany, Linn county, theretofore made by Foster to the Craw--fords and’ Ashby Pearce, set aside as fraudulent.. The other parties, including Goltra, were made defendants in the bill, because they were, or claimed to be, judgment creditors of Foster’s, and .in their answers they set up their claims accordingly. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bronson v. La Crosse & Milwaukie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Day v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Field v. SchieffelinNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
3Cited by5 opinions
- Venner v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Harris & Co. v. Thlinket Packing Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1916
- Chalmers v. TrentUtah Supreme Court · 1895
- Christmas Gold Mining Co. v. MillikenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1912
- Hobson v. HuxtableNebraska Supreme Court · 1907