Legal Opinion
Cassidy v. Murray
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. GLR-14-1204PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GEORGE L. RUSSELL, III, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Susan A. Cassidy and John E. Bronson’s claims against Defendant Pamela A. Murray for injuries they sustained as a result of Murray’s alleged negligent operation of a vessel in the Patapsco River off of Curtis Bay, Baltimore, Maryland. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Cas-sidy’s Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 23). The Court, having reviewed the pleadings and supporting documents, finds no hearing necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2014). For the reasons outlined below, Cassidy’s Motion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Lewis v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Madruga v. Superior Court of Cal., County of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mayor of Balt. v. BP P. L.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Bartel ex rel. Estate of Bishop v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Langlois v. Kirby Inland Marine, LPDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Nassau County Bridge Authority v. OlsenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- A.E.A. ex rel. Angelopoulos v. Volvo Penta of Americas, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.