Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Stubblefield

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1930No. 3828PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevx, J.

(after stating the case as above).

The assignments of error in behalf of Mrs. Kelley present, in effect, the points in view that she was entitled to relief and protection by injunction because she was proven to be the true legal owner of the land as her separate property under a valid deed duly delivered before the time of the levy of the attachment. The trial court denied the injunction upon findings of fact, in effect, that there had been no delivery of the deed to Mrs.. Kelley until after the levy of the attachment, writ upon the land, and the deed was legally fraudulent as against existing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maddox v. SummerlinTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Dosche, Administrator v. NetteTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Goolsby v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Landa Cotton Oil Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Godfrey v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. INTERSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Inman v. Texas Land & Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Taylor v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Horsley v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Guaranty Building & Loan Co. v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API