Legal Opinion

Long v. Kingdon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCaton, C. J.

The plaintiff introduced a note in evidence, upon which there was a payment indorsed, and the jury neglected to allow the credit indorsed, but rendered the verdict for the full amount of the note, and that verdict is attempted to be sustained, because the defendant did not formally read the indorsement to the jury. No such formality was necessary. When the note was put in evidence-, the credit upon it was in evidence also. Suppose an account had been introduced and proved, upon which there were credits, would the defendant have been bound to read those credits in a formal manner to the jury…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Giddings v. McCumberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API