Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Howell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 2, 1973No. 73-136PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

IN RE: RULE ON CLERK DENIED

This involves a petition filed by the attorney for Charles T. Bernard, et al. for a rule on the clerk directing, him to accept, file and docket, a record on appeal to this court.

The petitioner, Charles T. Bernard, individually and as chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party filed a class action in the Pulaski County Chancery Court challenging as unconstitutional, the manner in which the members of the Arkansas Senate of the 69th General Assembly divided their terms by lot under Section 6 of Amendment 23 to the Constitution of Arkansas.

The petitioner filed notice of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. West v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Criner v. CrinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Philyaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. C & M TRACTOR CO.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Chesley v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  3. Thomas v. Committee "A" Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Owens v. Bill & Tony's Liquor StoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Harkness v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API