Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Eisner

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 29, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Henry Siegel and another against Adolph Eisner. Judgment for plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

The duty and liability of a bailee for hire is stated as follows in Schouler’s Bailments and Carriers-:

Section 134: “As to the measure of care and diligence required, the hirer for use is,, like all other mutual benefit bailees, bound to exercise ordinary or average care and diligence; and for nothing less than ordinary negligence, or the failure to exercise such care and diligence as persons of average prudence bestow toward such property, or upon their own property under like circumstances, is he, while confining himself to the terms of the employment, legally responsible. This in each case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. KleinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  2. Allen v. Fulton Motor Car Co.New York Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Thorn v. StrausAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  4. Lyons v. ThomasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  5. Littlefield v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erickson v. Graham & Daniel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API