Citizens' Bank v. Bowen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Error from, Anderson District Court. Action, brought by Constance Boioen, as plaintiff, against The Citizens’ Banh of Garnett, as defendant, to recover money which the petition alleged had been deposited by the plaintiff with the defendant, as a banker, and subject to call.
Read the full summary
Error from, Anderson District Court. Action, brought by Constance Boioen, as plaintiff, against The Citizens’ Banh of Garnett, as defendant, to recover money which the petition alleged had been deposited by the plaintiff with the defendant, as a banker, and subject to call. At the September Term, 1877, of the district court, the said plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant; and the said Constance Bowen and her husband, Preston Bowen, who had entered his appearance as a party defendant in the action, obtained a final order against said defendant bank. New trial denied, and the…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action instituted in the district court of Anderson county by Constance Bowen, as plaintiff, against the Citizens’ bank of Garnett, as defendant, to recover $1,161.64, and interest, which the petition alleged had been deposited by the plaintiff with the bank, as a banker, subject to call. The bank filed its answer, denying this .allegation, and many of the other averments of the petition, and alleged that the money sued for was the property of Preston Bowen, the husband of Constance Bowen; that he, being insolvent, had…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jenness v. CutlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moore v. Greenville Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Moore v. Greenville Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Citizens' Bank of Garnett v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Reichert v. Bay City BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Berg v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.