Legal Opinion

PAMELA L. v. Farmer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1980No. Civ. 57437PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

This is an action for assault and battery and negligence. Plaintiffs (appellants) are three minor girls who, according to the allegations of the complaint, were sexually molested by defendant Richard Farmer, Jr., at his home between July 1976 and May 1977. 1 Defendant Elsie Farmer (respondent) is Richard’s wife. Richard answered the complaint, but Elsie demurred to it. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal as to Elsie, following the sustaining of her demurrer to the second amended complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 581, subd. 3, 581d.)

The pertinent allegations against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mann v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Gritzner v. Michael R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. J.S. v. R.T.H.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Rodriguez v. Inglewood Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. McKenzie v. Hawai'i Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lovell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API