Legal Opinion
Doyle v. LaCroix
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 11, 1957PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
The plaintiff in this action in tort for personal injuries had verdicts under a count for negligence and a count for maintaining a nuisance. These are the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of his motions for a directed verdict on each count and of his motion for a new trial based on the claim of an excessive award. The defendant is the executor of the will of one Ira L. Jenkins who on February 28, 1952, was the operator (hereinafter called the “occupant”) of the Dudley Super Market at 2337 Washington Street, Boston.
The evidence, taken most favorably for the plaintiff, permitted the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDermott's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Whalen v. ShivekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Boomer v. WilburMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Davis v. John L. Whiting & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Pickett v. Waldorf System, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McNamara v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Ducey v. Springfield Co-Operative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- O'Brien v. ChristensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Bousquet v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Thurlow v. Town of ProvincetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.