Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided June 25, 1974Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUESTIONS: 1. Does s. 397.20(1), F.S., authorize a licensed drug program to request reimbursement for clients received from HRS Division of Corrections? 2. Could licensed drug abuse programs request reimbursement under s. 397.20(1), F.S., if the Division of Corrections received court orders directing treatment for clients under s. 397.13(1), F.S.?

SUMMARY: The Division of Corrections has no authority to refer persons to licensed drug abuse programs under ss. 397.12 and 397.13, F.S.; therefore, such programs cannot claim reimbursement under s. 397.20(1), F.S., and the disbursement of moneys…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. Sea Isle HotelSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Alsop v. PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. A. R. Douglass, Inc. v. McRainey, as Admrx.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Ideal Farms Drainage District v. Certain LandsSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  5. Wheeler v. MeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API