Porter v. Porter
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSandstrom, Justice
[¶ 23] Because the district court properly followed the law and because the majority wrongly seeks to substitute its *872judgment for that of the district court on findings of fact, I dissent.
[¶24] Plainly and simply stated, the district court found that this is a move-away case involving bad motives on the part of the custodial parent.
[¶ 25] The record shows that the custodial parent’s transfer to Alaska reflects his “dream sheet” filing with the Air Force, indicating Alaska as his “dream” location. He acknowledged that he did not have to make such a filing. The custodial parent’s attorney…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stout v. StoutNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Dickson v. DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Oppegard-Gessler v. GesslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Kraft v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994