Legal Opinion

Stein v. Steindler

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1892Published

Appeal by defendant from judgment entered against him on verdict directed by the court and from order denying new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

This action is dgainst the defendant as payee indorser of a promissory note for $740, made by one Regina Mayer on December 3, 1889, at four months, and due on April sixth, and upon which $600 had been paid prior to May 9, 1890, leaving the balance of $140 sued for herein. It appears that on September 10,1890, an agreement for valuable considerations and under seal was made between said Regina' Mayer as party of the first part, and this plaintiff, who was then the holder of said note, as party of the second part, and which recited among other things, that “ whereas the parties hereto have this…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bower v. TiermannNew York Supreme Court · 1846

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API