Legal Opinion

N. P. R. R. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1917No. S. F. No. 7651PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles A. Bowdish was in the employ of the petitioner as chief clerk of its freight auditing department. His duties, as the title of his position indicates, were clerical, and for the most part were performed in the city and county of San Francisco, where are located the main offices of the company. The company also employed traveling agents, who inspected and corrected the books of local freight agents, and instructed them in the proper keeping thereof. Occasionally Mr. Bowdish was called upon to perform like work. In February, 1914, it appeared that the local agent of the company at Ukiah,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ocean Acc. Etc. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Christensen v. Hauff Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Southern Casualty Co. v. EhlersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Inland Gas Corp. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co. v. DedmonTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API