Legal Opinion

The People v. Oakley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 2013No. C070776APublished

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MURRAY, J.

Defendant James Edward Oakley was convicted on multiple criminal charges, including transportation of methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a).) As a repeat offender, defendant was sentenced to an aggregate term of 11 years four months in state prison. Defendant appeals his sentence, arguing that the trial court wrongly sentenced him to an additional three-year term under Health and Safety Code section 11370.2, because the transportation of methamphetamine charge for which he was convicted was based on transportation for personal use. Defendant also contends…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. EMMALCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. People v. LaCrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API