Legal Opinion

Cadle Co. v. Gasbusters Production I Ltd. Partnership

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 12, 2016No. 2015-CA-000323-MRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANMETER, JUDGE:

The doctrine of res judicata serves to preclude relitigation of claims which have been previously adjudicated. The issue we must decide in this case is whether the Lawrence Circuit Court erred in granting *715summary judgment in favor of Gasbusters Production I Limited Partnership and its general partner, FL-Gasbusters, Inc. (hereinafter jointly “Gasbusters”), and against The Cadle Company (“Cadle”) as a result of a bankruptcy judgment. We hold that the trial court did not err and therefore affirm its judgment.

I. Factual and Procedural Background.

In 2002, C. Lester Paul and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Scifres v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Massey (PS) v. Rithm Capital Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
  2. Massey v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API