Legal Opinion · Dissent

West Lumber Co. v. Morris & Barnes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1923No. 1008Published

1DissentWalker, J.

I concur with my brethren in their disposition of this case, and in all their conclusions except the construction of article 5246 — 1, Revised Civil Statutes (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1918), in its relation to the defense of assumed risk. Appellant’s fourteenth proposition is as follows:

“Regardless of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, an employee assumes those risks which are inherent in the work being done, which cannot be eliminated and which exist after the master has exercised ordinary care with reference thereto for the safety of the servant.”

This proposition is based upon the court’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Holland v. Tenn. Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Stuart v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Ashton v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API