Legal Opinion

Reinecke v. Mitchell

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1950No. 5219PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The appellants who were defendants below seek the review of a judgment against them in favor of appellee rendered by the District Court of Chaves County on account of hay delivered under a contract of purchase between the parties. The amount of the judgment is $1,203.66. It was entered on findings of fact and conclusions of law which were made and filed following a trial before the court without a jury.

While five assignments of error are made, counsel for appellants reduce them to a single point for purposes of argument, namely, the admission in evidence of certain weight…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  2. ULM v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Doyle v. Chief Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Oklahoma Hay & Grain Co. v. T. D. Randall & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Davis v. GrahamWyoming Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Clark v. BergenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. KonviserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Sapp v. Atlas Building Products CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Olson v. McLeanMontana Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API