Legal Opinion
Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. Lord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 7, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a condemnation proceeding in which the issue whether a certain easement had been extinguished was submitted to the court by means of a submission of controversy pursuant to CPLR 3222, the plaintiff condemnor appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 3,1974, which (1) granted the application of Pine Top Building Corp. for leave to intervene as a party defendant, (2) provided that the easement in question had been extinguished by reason of the condemnation and (3) directed the commissioners of appraisal to ascertain the compensation to which the intervenor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jackson v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Kahlen v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Wolfe v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. Movers & Warehousemen's Ass'n of Greater New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coccio v. ParisiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. LordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982