Legal Opinion

Flora v. Julesburg Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1920No. 9896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action by mortgagee for possession of a motor truck. Judgment for defendant. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of Sedgwick County, Hon. L. C. Stephenson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Flora, plaintiff in error and plaintiff below, brought replevin against the Motor Company for a Ford truck. The defendant had judgment. Plaintiff comes here on error and moves for a supersedeas.

Plaintiff was a resident of Julesburg, which is a mile distant from the Nebraska line, and the defendant operated' a garage in that place. Stainbrook, a farmer, lived eight or ten miles over the line in Nebraska. He bought a Ford truck of Flora at Julesburg and gave a chattel mortgage to secure the purchase price. He took the truck to his house in Nebraska and Flora recorded his mortgage in that state.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shapard v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Handley v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Taylor v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
  4. Ware v. SchintzIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Cobb v. BuswellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mosko v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  2. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Yellow Mfg. Accept. Corp. v. Rogers and SchoolerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Rocky Mountain Seed Co. v. McArthurSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Robbins v. BostianCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API