Legal Opinion

Ex parte Schmidt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Béfore WitheRSPOON, J., Richland, March, 1885. This was an appeal from an order of the Court of General Sessions dismissing a writ of certiorari. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Me. Justice McGowaN.

Frederick Schmidt petitioned the Court, stating that the city council of Columbia had tried and convicted him of “disorderly conduct in the opera house of said city”; that he had no right of appeal from the sentence pronounced, which was that he should pay a fine of forty dollars, or be confined in the guard house for ten days; and being about to be deprived of his liberty by reason of said sentence, which was erroneous and illegal, the city council being wholly without juris*364diction in the premises, prayed for a writ of certiorari,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vason v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868
  2. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Jeroid J. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API