Legal Opinion · Dissent

Houseal v. Certain-Teed Products Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1969No. Appeal, No. 24Published

1Dissent

*499Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

Appellant is a claimant under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.

On July 5, 1958, he suffered an accidental leg injury while employed by appellee. He was then sixty-seven years old. In 1959, following a hearing, he was awarded compensation for 50% disability. This compensation was paid until the maximum period allowed by law for such partial disability expired in 1965.1

On March 17, 1966, appellant filed a petition to reinstate compensation on the ground that his original disability had become total. A hearing was held before a compensation referee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Petrone v. Moffat Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Hamilton v. Procon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Boggs v. Jewell Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Marshall v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Clark v. Clearfield Opera House Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API