Legal Opinion

Heine v. Hill, Harris & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1925No. 2291PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

This is ' a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation. Law.

Plaintiff sues defendant to recover $18 per week for 400 weeks commencing September 26, 1923, and for the further sum of $250 for medical services, hospital bills, etc., incurred during his illness.

He sets out as a cause of action that he was employed by defendant to put a roof on a building owned by Dave Caplan which defendant had contracted to cover, and while at work putting on said roof he fell and as a result of the fall his back was fractured, his lower spine and lower limbs completely paralysed, and that he is totally disabled to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dick v. Gravel Logging Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Burt v. Davis-Wood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Bell v. Albert Hanson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Younse Lbr. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Morgan v. NelmsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Durant v. Industrial Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Schwandt v. WitteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API