Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ballestrino v. Ballestrino

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1990No. 02057Published

1DissentJohnson, Judge

I join my esteemed colleagues in concluding that the appeal taken on July 19, 1989 from a trial court order entered on April 22, 1988 must be quashed for the reasons set forth in the majority opinion. I also agree that we are presented with a single issue for review: May an agreement of support contained in a property settlement agreement be modified when such agreement is incorporated in a decree of divorce which provides that “said Agreement shall not merge with, but shall survive this Decree and Order”?

For me, the answer is found in § 401.1 of the Divorce Code, 28 P.S. § 401.1 (as amended…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Krenzelak v. KrenzelakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Sonder v. SonderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Bacchetta v. BacchettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Smith v. FennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API