Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Dickinson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1996No. Docket 179207, 179635PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, P.J.

In these consolidated appeals, defendants appeal by leave granted the circuit court’s order denying their respective motions for summary disposition. Defendants claim that the court erred as a matter of law in interpreting 1993 PA 78 contrary to its plainly stated language. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff Julie Morrison sought prenatal care from defendant Timothy K. Dickinson, M.D., at defendant Allegan Medical Clinic, P.C., during the course of her third pregnancy. On May 21, 1992, defendant physician admitted Mrs. Morrison to defendant Allegan General Hospital to deliver the child.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Price v. HopkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Dyke v. RichardMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Neal v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. VandenBerg v. VandenBergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Rheaume v. VandenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Mazumder v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Ward v. SianoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API