Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 1974No. 74-569Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCharles Carroll, Associate Judge

I respectfully dissent from this court’s affirmance of the sentences that were imposed following the revocation of probation, awarded after new trial was granted, which were in excess of those imposed on the original convictions. In other respects I concur in the opinion and judgment.

By § 948.06 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., upon revocation of the probation the court was authorized to “impose any sentence which it might have originally imposed before placing the probationer on probation.”

In my view that statutory provision has relation to any sentence the court could have imposed at the time or the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Kilpatrick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Cox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Standifer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API