Legal Opinion

Arif v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 21, 2007No. 06-60557PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

Nasra Arif (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) of her request for asylum and withholding of removal. Petitioner contends that her asylum application was timely filed and that she is a derivative beneficiary of her husband’s application for withholding of removal. As we do not have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision that the asylum application was untimely, and as we agree that withholding of removal does not provide for derivative beneficiaries, we deny the petition for review.

I. FACTS AND…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Khagendra Sharma v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Taylor v. Acxiom Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Abdifatah Gaas Qorane v. William Barr, U. S. AttyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. Kane v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. True the Vote v. HosemannDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API