Miramon v. City of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Louisiana
IN RE Jean Miramon Applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeals, Parish of Orleans,! State of Louisiana.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Blanchard, J.
The question raised herein is whether or not taxes due the City of New Orleans for the years 1891, 1892 and 1894 are subject to the prescription of three years.
*1624The contention of plaintiff is that the city taxes, as well as tax mortgages and tax privileges, are prescribed by that length of time, and the second clause of section 34 of Act 98 of 1886 is pointed to as sustaining the same.
This clause, or that portion of it pertinent hereto, is as follows:
“All taxes, tax mortgages and tax privileges shall be prescribed by three years from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holmes v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
- Clark v. ComfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- DeGruy v. Jos. A. Aiken & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McGregor v. DiamondLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- SUCCESSION OF CALDARERA v. ZenoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Bank of White Castle v. BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Rousset v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- J. H. Hines Co. v. GuillotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.