ANDRE PATTERSON v. J.B. PRITZKER, et al.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ANDRE PATTERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 25-3136 ) J.B. PRITZKER, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) MERIT REVIEW ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and presently incarcerated at Joliet Treatment Center was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The case is now before the Court for a merit review of Plaintiff’s claims. The Court must “screen” Plaintiff’s complaint, and through such process to identify and dismiss any legally insufficient claim, or the entire action if warranted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. A claim is legally…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pruitt v. MoteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Gregory Turley v. Dave RednourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Michael Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.