Legal Opinion

Kramer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1918No. 6 Div. 935. [fn*]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cullman County; R. C. Briekell, Judge. Joe H. Kramer was convicted of larceny by embezzlement, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, J.

The Supreme Court, in reviewing the opinion of this court heretofore promulgated, on certiorari (77 South. 353 1 ), only deal with the question of the sufficiency of the proof to sustain the averments of the indictment that the defendant was an officer of the bank, which under the indictment and the statute was an essential element of the offense charged against him. Code, § 6830; Pullam v. State, 78 Ala. 31, 56 Am. Rep. 21. We therefore adhere to the pronouncement in the former opinion that Acts 1911, pp. 50 to 86, did not effect a repeal of section 6830 of the Code. Kramer v. State, ante,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lacey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Wefel v. StillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Pollack v. Gunter & GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Pullam v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Martin v. Jesse-French P. & O. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hinds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Larson v. HaferNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Foster v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Meadows v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Belcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API