Hart v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Eastern District of Michigan. John Hart ivas convicted of criminal offenses, and brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLER, District Judge.
At the March term,-1906, of the District Court for the Southern Division of the Eastern District of Michigan, the grand jury returned three indictments for violation of the oleomargarine law against the plaintiff in error, John Hart, and two others. One indictment charged Hart with carrying on the business of a manufacturer of oleomargarine without having paid the special tax required by law. A second indictment charged him in the first count with producing, removing, and furnishing certain colored oleomargarine, and with defrauding the United States by not paying the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hartman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Albert George Fouts v. United States of America, Virgil Summers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- White v. BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.