Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Bigheart's Guardianship

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1932No. 21049Published

1DissentRiley, J.

The majority decision is admittedly a new construction.

“Subject to the approval of the county judge, ” as used in the statutes, section 1440, C. O. S. 1921 [O. S. 1931, sec. 1431] heretofore has meant the suitability of the person nominated to be guardian. Now it is construed to permit the county judge to inquire into the mental capacity of the minor.

It is said an adjudication to the contrary would open the door “to designing persons to procure the appointment of a guardian without the approval of the county judge.” Not so for a designing person is not a suitable person, and the function of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Guardianship of KirkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Coker v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Given v. PollockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. In Re Guardianship of BaptisteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API