Legal Opinion

Champlin Refining Co. v. Le Force

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 14, 1936No. 23961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant in error, Frank DeForee, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, brought his action and recovered judgment in the district court of Noble county against Ohamplin Refining Company, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, for malicious prosecution.

The prosecution which was the basis of the action charged the plaintiff with disposing of an oat crop on which the defendant held a chattel mortgage. The complaint in the criminal action was sworn to by one H. W. Carey, who, it was alleged in the amended petition, “was at ail times herein involved the duly appointed, qualified and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. El Reno Gas & Electric Co. v. SpurgeonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Dunnington v. LoeserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Hightower v. Union Savings & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Kable v. CareySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Towne v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Gray v. AbboudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. James v. Southwestern Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Ames v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. James v. Southwestern Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API