Kay v. Adams
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit was for trespass on land, and there was a count for use and occupation.
To recover for such a trespass, plaintiff must have been in possession, actual or constructive, at. the time of the commission of the trespass. The plaintiff did not show pedis possessio of the strip of land upon which defendants went, and therefore had to rely upon his constructive possession, under his title, in connection with his actual possession of a part of the lands embraced in his deed-s. There is no field of operation for constructive possession by one, when at such time the. land is in the actual…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Buck v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Powers v. HatterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Sadler v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Crabtree v. StreetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Crabtree v. StreetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Griffin v. BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Ramos v. FellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Frost v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Alexander v. LetsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.