First Presbyterian Church v. Hodge
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentSmith, J.
(dissenting) — I am unable to agree with the majority opinion. It perpetuates an anomalous confusing legal situation which our own statutes seem clearly designed to remove and which judicial thinking should seek a way to avoid. The importance of the question involved justifies, even requires, a statement of the grounds of dissent.
Appellant has litigated in the state of decedent’s domicile the very issue it presents here, viz.: Is the instrument in question her will or did decedent die intestate? The Illinois court held there had been a revocation. In re Barrie’s Will, 393 Ill. 111, 65 N. E.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ellis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Coosaw Mining Co. v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Otto v. DotySupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Trotter v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- In Re the Probate of the Will of GoldstickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.