Legal Opinion · Dissent

First Presbyterian Church v. Hodge

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 11, 1949No. 47238Published

1DissentSmith, J.

(dissenting) — I am unable to agree with the majority opinion. It perpetuates an anomalous confusing legal situation which our own statutes seem clearly designed to remove and which judicial thinking should seek a way to avoid. The importance of the question involved justifies, even requires, a statement of the grounds of dissent.

Appellant has litigated in the state of decedent’s domicile the very issue it presents here, viz.: Is the instrument in question her will or did decedent die intestate? The Illinois court held there had been a revocation. In re Barrie’s Will, 393 Ill. 111, 65 N. E.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ellis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Coosaw Mining Co. v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Otto v. DotySupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Trotter v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. In Re the Probate of the Will of GoldstickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API