Legal Opinion

Sare v. Hoadley Stone Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1914No. 8,325PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Prom. Lawrence Circuit Court; James B. Wilson, Judge. Action by Mack- Sare against the Hoadley Stone Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

This was an action by appellant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him while in the employ of appellee. The complaint was in two paragraphs and the answers were in general denial. The cause was tried by a jury which returned a general verdict in favor of appellant in the sum of $1,500. The jury also returned with the general verdict certain interrogatories and answers thereto. Appellee moved for judgment on these answers notwithstanding the general verdict which motion was sustained and appellant excepted. Judgment was then rendered against appellant and from this judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jenney Electric Manufacturing Co. v. FlanneryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. ParrishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Pulse v. SpencerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waking v. Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. W. McMillen & Son v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API