Legal Opinion

Texas-Oklahoma Express, Inc., and Lee Armstrong v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1970No. 9-70_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

The defendants were charged by information with a violation of a Regulation of the Department of Transportation promulgated under 18 U.S.C. § 834. The Regulation provides: “Motor vehicles transporting class A or class B explosives shall not be left unattended at any time during the course of transportation.” 49 C.F.R. § 397.1(b) (1969).

Upon trial to the court without a jury the defendants were found guilty and fined. They have now taken this appeal which challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to prove that the vehicle was “unattended,” and to prove that the Regulation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Standard Oil Company of Texas and Pasotex Pipe Line Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  4. Inland Freight Lines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  5. St. Johnsbury Trucking Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Harry L. Young & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API