Commonwealth v. Argueta
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtRubin, J.
The defendant, Samuel Argueta, was charged with two counts of malicious destruction of property, in violation of G. L. c. 266, § 127. A District Court judge allowed the Com*565monwealth’s motion to amend the complaint to charge the defendant with two counts of “tagging,” in violation of G. L. c. 266, § 126B.1 The defendant sought to admit to sufficient facts, and after a colloquy, the judge found sufficient facts to convict the defendant of tagging. The judge ordered that the charges be continued without a finding for a period of six months. On May 26, 2006, the charges against the defendant were…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. OrtizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. NettoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. CorreaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MillerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. Oswaldo O., a juvenileMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- COMMONWEALTH v. DANIEL A. DONALD.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022