Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Argueta

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 20, 2009No. 08-P-394PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRubin, J.

The defendant, Samuel Argueta, was charged with two counts of malicious destruction of property, in violation of G. L. c. 266, § 127. A District Court judge allowed the Com*565monwealth’s motion to amend the complaint to charge the defendant with two counts of “tagging,” in violation of G. L. c. 266, § 126B.1 The defendant sought to admit to sufficient facts, and after a colloquy, the judge found sufficient facts to convict the defendant of tagging. The judge ordered that the charges be continued without a finding for a period of six months. On May 26, 2006, the charges against the defendant were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. OrtizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. NettoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. CorreaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doe v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. Oswaldo O., a juvenileMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  4. COMMONWEALTH v. DANIEL A. DONALD.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API