Legal Opinion

Kulakowski v. Leavitt

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 8, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.

This is an action by prospective purchasers Richard B. and Phyllis Kula-kowski (“the Kulakowskis”) to recover a real estate deposit following their termination of the parties’ purchase and sale agreement because of an inability to obtain mortgage financing. The defendant-seller, William H. Leavitt (“Leavitt”), alleged that the Kula-kowskis’ failure to comply with the terms of the mortgage contingency clause precluded their proper termination of the agreement, and counterclaimed for consequential damages in excess of the liquidated amount of the deposit. After trial, the court found that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lynch v. AndrewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Stabile v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. DeFreitas v. CoteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. American Mechanical Corp. v. Union MacHine Co. of Lynn, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Sechrest v. SafiolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oakwood Living Centers, Inc. v. SaquetMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API