Legal Opinion

In re Finkelstein

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1925No. 7221PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

The order of the referee certified for review was brought before the court upon a certificate of the referee. It appears by the record certified that the bankrupt did not file with the referee a petition for review in accordance with General Order XXVII. As the General Order is mandatory in requiring a petition of the party desiring a review, this court, in the absence of sueh a petition, has no authority to review the action of the referee. In re Russell (D. C.) 105 F. 501; In re Home Discount Co. (D. C.) 147 F. 538, 17 Am. Bankr. Rep. 168.

The application for review…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Home Discount Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1906
  2. In re RussellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Wesley CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1937
  2. In Re FP Newport CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  3. In Re Mt. Jessup Coal Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. In re Wilkes Barre Yellow Cab Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API