Legal Opinion
Two Spring Associates v. New York City Loft Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael D. Stallman, J.
*531This CPLR article 78 proceeding requires the court to determine whether intervening rent regulation governs a lease renewal option and rent increase formula contracted before the change in law but exercised and effective thereafter. Petitioner Two Spring Associates seeks a judgment vacating the determination of respondent New York City Loft Board which granted an application by tenant-intervenor Andrew Bolotowsky for an order determining the lawful rent for the subject unit and determining that petitioner owner had overcharged the tenant.
Petitioner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB v. Montague Street Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- 902 Associates v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Plessdore Realty Corp. v. FasanoNew York Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Two Spring Assocs. v. New York City Loft Bd.New York Supreme Court · 2003