Legal Opinion
Czar, Inc. v. Heath
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 18, 2009No. A-114 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens
This appeal presents us with a novel question about the scope and application of the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20. In short, we are required to decide whether a contractor hired by a homeowner to design and install a kitchen and to perform certain other interior work in a new home then being built for the homeowner by a different contractor, was engaged in new home construction or was instead performing home improvements. The homeowners argue that the kitchen and interior work constituted home improvements, thus subjecting the contractor to suit pursuant to the CFA because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Marchak v. Claridge Commons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lee v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- All the Way Towing, LLC v. Bucks Cnty. Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
- Pinelands Preservation Alliance v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- Calco Hotel Mgt. Group v. Gike.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- In Re WellNx Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.