William H. Miller v. Patton-Tully Transportation Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
William H. Miller appeals from a district court order finding that PattonTully’s failure to provide means other than a cable by which its employees could move from a lower barge to a higher barge did not pose an unreasonable risk of harm to its employees, and that Patton-Tully accordingly was not at fault for Miller’s injuries. This order was entered following our earlier remand in this case. See Miller v. Patton-Tully Transp. Co., 851 F.2d 202 (8th Cir.1988). Miller argues that our remand was improper, and that the district court findings are contrary to those in its earlier opinion,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roger Johnson v. A/s Ivarans RederiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. SiebertSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- William H. Miller v. Patton-Tully Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Koutoufaris v. DickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992